Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohamed Kipkosgei v Republic

Kipkosgei v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E101 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 9162 (KLR) (17 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9162 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAPSABET MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E101 OF 2024 JR KARANJA, J JULY 17, 2024 BETWEEN MOHAMED KIPKOSGEI ........................................................................ APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant, Mohammed Kipkosgei was the fourth Accused when he appeared alongside three others before the Principal Magistrate at Kabiyet, charged with breaking into a building and committing a felony Contrary to Section 306(a) of the Penal Code. Alternatively, the Accused were charged with handling stolen good Contrary to Section 322(1) (2) of the Penal Code. 2. All the Accused including the Applicant pleaded guilty to the alternative counts and were convicted accordingly. Accused 2 and 3 were handed a probation sentence of 12months on account of their ages which indicated that they were juveniles and also on account of the pre-sentence report availed by the Probation Officer. 3. Accused 4 being the only adult was sentenced to serve imprisonment for a period of twelve (12) months. This sentence was lawful and not excessive by any stretch of imagination considering that he handled property which had been stolen from a primary school thereby encouraging the commission of such offences. In fact, for a deterrence effect a handler of stolen property should be severely punished more than the actual offender. 4. Therefore, the Applicant is not deserving of a review in sentence to enable him pay a fine. Such review would be a slap on the hand of the Applicant and a motivation for him to continue handling stolen property. Nonetheless, in view of the judiciary’s programme of de-congesting our penal facilities, the sentence is hereby reviewed to the extent that the sentence of twelve (12) months imprisonment https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9162/eng@2024-07-17 1

page 1 of 2

is substituted for a non-custodial sentence of probation for a period of two (2) years under the supervision of the Probation Officer responsible for Nandi/North Sub-County. DELIVERED AND DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY 2024 J. R. KARANJAH, JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9162/eng@2024-07-17 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.