Republic v County Member for Finance County Government of Kisumu (Judicial Review E39 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 8522 (KLR) (10 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 8522 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU JUDICIAL REVIEW E39 OF 2023 MS SHARIFF, J JULY 10, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND THE COUNTY MEMBER FOR FINANCE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KISUMU ................................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the Applicant’s notice of motion dated 9.4.2024, the supporting affidavit sworn by Jael A. Onyango on even date and the annexures thereto. I have also considered the oral submissions of the party and I note that the application is unopposed and has even been conceded to by Ms. Odhiambo Counsel for the Respondent and I therefore allow the it and make the following orders:1. An order of mandamus be and is hereby issued against the County Executive Member for Finance, County Government of Kisumu the Respondent herein to pay the Applicant the sum of Kshs.266,035 plus interest at the rate of 14% per annum from 17th December 2015 until payment in full, the said sum being the decree and certified costs in Kisumu High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 320 of 2015: Otieno Ragot & Co. Advocates -vs- The County Government of Kisumu. 2. The Applicant is awarded costs of this application which are assessed at Kshs.60,000. 3. This file is marked as closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2024. M. S. SHARIFF JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/8522/eng@2024-07-10 1
Original judgment
Republic v The County Member For Finance County Government of Kisumu
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.