Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jason Opati v Republic

Opati v Republic (Criminal Petition E004 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 8041 (KLR) (28 June 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 8041 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL PETITION E004 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J JUNE 28, 2024 BETWEEN JASON OPATI ......................................................................................... PETITIONER AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Maseno Senior Principal Magistrate Criminal Case No. 849 of 2017) RULING 1. The Applicant/Petitioner Jason Opati is a convict in Maseno SPM Sexual Ofiences Case No. 849 OF 2017. 2. He was sentenced to serve life imprisonment for the ofience of defilement for the ofience of defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act. 3. He prays for a less severe sentence. However, from his own pleadings, he appealed vide HCCRA No. 73 of 2018 at Kisumu High Court which appeal was dismissed. 4. There are no court proceedings or record of appeal annexed. Nonetheless, I find no reasons why a 71year-old man can pounce on a child less than 11 years and defile her. He should have respected his age, that of a great grandfather to the child victim. 5. I decline to interfere with the sentence imposed. The application for sentence review is dismissed. 6. Signal to issue. File closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/8041/eng@2024-06-28 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/8041/eng@2024-06-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.