Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Vitalis Ochola v Republic

Ochola v Republic (Criminal Petition E005 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 8015 (KLR) (28 June 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 8015 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL PETITION E005 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J JUNE 28, 2024 BETWEEN VITALIS OCHOLA ................................................................................. PETITIONER AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Winam Senior Principal Magistrate Criminal Sexual Offences Case No. 1 of 2018) RULING 1. The Applicant/Petitioner Vitalis Ochola seeks for Sentence Review. He was convicted vide Winam SRM Sexual Ofiences Case No. 1 of 2018 of the ofience of gang defilement and was sentenced to serve 15 years’ imprisonment. 2. He appealed to this court vide HCCRA No. 46 of 2019. The appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed vide Judgment rendered on 4th February 2020. 3. He applied for revision of sentence vide criminal Petition No. 74 of 2020 which was dismissed. 4. This court has no residual power to review the sentence confirmed by the Court on Appeal and through resentencing vide Criminal Petition No. 74 of 2020. 5. The application for sentence review dated 22nd January 2-24 is dismissed. 6. This file is closed. 7. Signal to issue. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/8015/eng@2024-06-28 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/8015/eng@2024-06-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.