Ocholla v Ogoto (Civil Appeal E132 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 7869 (KLR) (3 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7869 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL E132 OF 2024 MS SHARIFF, J JULY 3, 2024 BETWEEN HAROLD OCHOLLA .............................................................................. APPELLANT AND MARK IAN SIDANDI OGOTO ......................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the appellant’s notice of motion dated 20.6.2024, the certificate of urgency issued by Dr. Miyawa Maxwel Esquire advocate on even date, the supporting affidavit sworn by Harold Ocholla on the same date and the annexures thereto, which annexures are hardly legible and I do make the following orders: 1. Given that there is no evidence of commercial execution processes this application is not certified as urgent. 2. The applicant is directed to upload legible annexures to his application herein within 1 day from the date herein. 3. The application be served and the same be mentioned for directions on 10th July, 2024. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED THIS 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024. M. S. SHARIFF JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7869/eng@2024-07-03 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.