Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 7766 of 2024

In re Estate of William Gwara Okelo (Deceased) (Miscellaneous Succession Cause E099 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 7766 (KLR) (28 June 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7766 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS SUCCESSION CAUSE E099 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J JUNE 28, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM GWARA OKELO DECEASED AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY FRANCIS OCHIENG GWARA [PETITIONER] FROM ORIGINAL KISUMU CHIEF MAGISTRATE’S SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. E166 OF 2024 RULING 1. The deceased William Gwara Okelo, according to the documents filed, including letter dated 18/3/2024 by the Chief, Kapuonja Location, was a resident of that location which is within the jurisdiction of Maseno law Courts. Similarly, the estate property listed as per the search certificate annexed to the petition for grant which is Kisumu/Kapuonja/2440 is within the jurisdiction of Maseno Law Courts. 2. I hereby transfer Kisumu CM Succession Cause No. E166 of 2024 to Maseno SPM’S Court in whose jurisdiction the deceased was domiciled. 3. The original Kisumu CM Succession No. E166 of 2024 to be transmitted to Maseno SPM’s court together with this ruling and order. 4. Upon receipt of the file and order, SPM Maseno Law Courts to notify the parties using the addresses given to move the court and prosecute the succession cause and to file into court all the necessary consents before any grant can issue. 5. This file is closed. 6. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7766/eng@2024-06-28 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7766/eng@2024-06-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.