Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kariuki Nguithi v Martha Wangari Mwangi

In re Estate of the Late Joyce Wanjiku Muturi (Deceased) (Succession Cause 3160 of 2003) [2024] KEHC 7437 (KLR) (Family) (20 June 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7437 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) FAMILY SUCCESSION CAUSE 3160 OF 2003 HK CHEMITEI, J JUNE 20, 2024 BETWEEN KARIUKI NGUITHI ............................................................................... APPLICANT AND MARTHA WANGARI MWANGI ...................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. In his application dated 19th May 2021 the Applicant prays for orders that:(a) Pursuant to the revocation of grant on 2nd December 2014 a further order be made reverting land parcel no Kakuzi /Kirimiti Block 9/933 in the name of the deceased Joyce Wanjiku Muturi. (b) An order be made cancelling any and all partitions, subdivisions, transfer or any other dealings in respect to land parcel number Kakuzi /Kirimiti Block 9/933. (c) The Land Registrar Thika be directed to effect the orders/prayers in (a) and (b) above if granted. 2. The Applicant prays for costs to be awarded to him. 3. The application is supported by the sworn affidavit of the Applicant as well as the supporting affidavit of Lucy Njeri Nguithi his sister. 4. The application is actually a follow up to the ruling of this court dated 2nd December 2014 in which the court cancelled the grant confirmed and dated 28th May 1999 and order the suit property namely Kakuzi /Kirimiti block 9/933 to be divided among the three siblings. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7437/eng@2024-06-20 1

page 1 of 2

5. It appears that the Applicant faced hurdles in carrying out the decree and order of this court as the land Registrar demanded a direct order from this court. It further appears that the Respondent went ahead to carry out further subdivisions contrary to the orders of this court. 6. There was no response from the Respondent despite being served. 7. Having looked at the amended decree of this court dated 2nd December 2014 I find that there is merit in the application as the prayers are in line with it. 8. In the premises the application is hereby allowed as follows:(a) All titles emanating from any subdivision, partitions and or transfer of land parcel number Kakuzi /Kirimiti/Block 9/933 are hereby cancelled for all intend and purposes. (b) The Land Registrar Thika land registry shall after the above cancellation ensure that title number Kakuzi /Kirimiti Block 9/933 is restored and the same shall be sub divided into three equal portions in line with the amended decree from this court dated 22nd December 2014. (c) The Applicant shall have the costs of this application. DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA VIDEO LINK THIS 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2024. H K CHEMITEI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7437/eng@2024-06-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.