Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Vincent Mokoa v Republic

Mokoa v Republic (Criminal Revision E090 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 7365 (KLR) (12 June 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7365 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL REVISION E090 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J JUNE 12, 2024 BETWEEN VINCENT MOKOA ................................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Kisumu Chief Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 373 of 2013) RULING 1. The Applicant is Vincent Mokoa. By his application dated 2nd April 2024 from Naivasha Maximum Prison, he seeks for sentence review. 2. He claims that the was convicted and sentenced to serve life imprisonment vide Kisumu Chief Magistrate Criminal Case No. 373 of 2013 for the ofience of robbery with violence. 3. He appealed to the High Court vide HCCRA No. 121 of 2015 which appeal was dismissed and that his appeal to the Court of Appeal in 2016 has never received any response. 4. He claims that he is entitled to resentencing and to a less severe sentence as stipulated in Article 50(2) (p) and (q) of the Constitution. 5. I have considered the application which is not supported by any court proceedings or documents and I am unable to find any material upon which I can grant the orders sought. 6. The application is dismissed. 7. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7365/eng@2024-06-12 1

page 1 of 2

R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7365/eng@2024-06-12 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.