Gaikia v Njuguna & another (Miscellaneous Application E114 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 7170 (KLR) (30 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7170 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E114 OF 2021 DO CHEPKWONY, J MAY 30, 2024 BETWEEN JAMES NJOROGE GAIKIA .................................................................... APPLICANT AND PETER GATU NJUGUNA ............................................................ 1ST RESPONDENT SAMUEL NJENGA KAMAU ....................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. This matter is for mention for parties to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. There is no appearance by either party and or their respective counsel. There is no representation to explain their absence. 2. This has been the trend since 15th June, 2022 when the matter was fixed for mention on 14th July, 2022. It is clear that the parties have lost interest in having this case prosecuted; a result of which the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution as provided for under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. It is so ordered. RULING DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2024. D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE In the presence of: No appearance for and by either parties Court Assistant - Martin https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/7170/eng@2024-05-30 1
Original judgment
James Njoroge Gaikia v Peter Gatu Njuguna & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.