Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Adan Hassan

Republic v Hassan (Criminal Case E007 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 6796 (KLR) (15 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6796 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE E007 OF 2023 GMA DULU, J MAY 15, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND ADAN HASSAN ............................................................................................ ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused herein, through defence counsel Mr. Mwanyumba has asked for bail pending trial. Defence counsel has emphasized that the key witness in the case, a minor son of the accused person, has now already testified. 2. The Prosecuting Counsel Mr. Sirima on the other hand, has objected to the release of the accused person on bail on the ground that the accused person who comes from the Kenyan/Ethiopia border has with no fixed abode, and is thus a flight risk. Counsel has also submitted that if released the accused person is likely to harm the key witness, his minor son, and relied on the affidavit in opposition to bail sworn by the investigating officer Cpl. David Kiprop Langat on 14th February 2024. 3. I have considered the application and opposition thereto. Bail/bond is a constitutional right and is applicable to all ofiences, serious or not serious. Article 49(h) of the Constitution provides that every arrested person has a right to be released on bail/bond unless there exist compelling reasons for denial of the same. 4. Each case has to be considered on its own merits and peculiar facts. 5. In the present case, there is no contest that the key witness who has already testified is a child of the accused person. He is presently in the custody of relatives, but this court cannot supervise the access of the accused person to the said child of tender years. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/6796/eng@2024-05-15 1

page 1 of 2

6. It is also not contested that the accused person comes from the border area between Kenya and Ethiopia. It is also not contested that presently he has no fixed abode in Voi, and it is not known what engagement would keep him in Voi. 7. In those circumstances, I find the probability of the accused person being a flight risk to be a compelling reason for denial of bail/bond herein. 8. I thus decline to grant the accused person bail/bond. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY 2024 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI. GEORGE DULU JUDGE In the presence of:Alfred – Court Assistant Mr. Sirima for State Mr. Mwanyumba for the accused Accused https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/6796/eng@2024-05-15 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.