Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Resident Magistrates Court, Siaya

Republic v Resident Magistrates Court, Siaya; Aloo (Exparte); Magoha (Interested Party) (Miscellaneous Civil Application 154 of 2003) [2024] KEHC 6681 (KLR) (3 June 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6681 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION 154 OF 2003 RE ABURILI, J JUNE 3, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT, SIAYA .................................. RESPONDENT AND LUCAS APIYO ALOO ................................................................................. EX PARTE AND WILLIAM OGOLA MAGOHA ............................................... INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. This is a 2003 matter initiated by way of Notice of Motion dated 28th July 2003 seeking for Judicial Review orders of Certiorari and Prohibition. 2. The application was never prosecuted as the original suit whose proceedings were sought to be quashed is Siaya Resident Magistrate Civil Application No. 66 of 2003 which was concluded, from the record, it is clear that the application subject of this file was overtaken by events and died naturally. 3. Nonetheless, as there must be an order closing the file, the application dated 28th July 2003 is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. This file is now closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/6681/eng@2024-06-03 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.