Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rael Karea Kirimi & 1 other v Francis M’ikinyua M’murira

In re Estate of Godfrey Muriithi Buuri (Deceased) (Succession Cause 287 of 2013) [2024] KEHC 6417 (KLR) (30 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6417 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU SUCCESSION CAUSE 287 OF 2013 TW CHERERE, J MAY 30, 2024 BETWEEN RAEL KAREA KIRIMI ..................................................................... 1ST APPLICANT SARAH KIENDE KIRIMI ................................................................ 2ND APPLICANT AND FRANCIS M’IKINYUA M’MURIRA ................................................... PETITIONER RULING 1. Francis M’Ikinyua M’Murira (Petitioner) filed this cause on 21st May, 2013 claiming beneficial interest. 2. On 15th October, 2013, he obtained an inhibition order over LR No. Abothuguchi/Gaitu/360. 3. Subsequently, by a ruling dated 14th April, 2014, this cause was struck out in its entirety. 4. From the foregoing, I find that it would be in the interest of justice to lift the inhibition over LR No Abothuguchi/Gaitu/360 the cause on which it was grounded having been struck out. 5. Consequently, the summons dated 15th November, 2023 is allowed in the following terms: 1. An order is hereby issued lifting the inhibition placed over LR. No. Abothuguchi/Gaitu/360 2. No order for costs DELIVERED IN MERU THIS 30th DAY OF May 2024 WAMAE. T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Appearances Court Assistant - Morris Kinoti https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/6417/eng@2024-05-30 1

page 1 of 2

For Petitioner - N/A For Applicants - Mr. Sigilai for Sigilai Joel & Co. Advocates https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/6417/eng@2024-05-30 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.