Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Cecil Kouko & Associates Advocates v Philip Omondi Okello

Cecil Kouko & Associates Advocates v Okello (Miscellaneous Civil Application E149 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 6218 (KLR) (30 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6218 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION E149 OF 2023 RE ABURILI, J MAY 30, 2024 BETWEEN CECIL KOUKO & ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES .................................. APPLICANT AND PHILIP OMONDI OKELLO ............................................................... RESPONDENT (Arising from the professional services rendered by the Applicant to the Respondent in the original Kisumu CM Children Case No. E090 of 2021) RULING 1. I have considered the application dated 30th October 2023. I observe that the Taxation was undertaken without calling for the primary file Kisumu Magistrate’s Court Children’s Court Case No. E090 of 2021 for perusal and verification of the items in the bill of costs dated 4th September 2023. 2. It follows that the basis upon which the taxation was undertaken is unknown as the items on the bill of costs were never verified. 3. On the court’s own motion, I hereby set aside the taxation and certificate of costs dated 30th December 2023 and return the file to the Deputy Registrar to call for the primary file where the professional services were rendered and retax the bill based on the trial court record. 4. Taxation shall be on 13th June 2024 before the Deputy Registrar. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kisumu this 30th Day of May, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE Page 2 of 2 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/6218/eng@2024-05-30 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.