Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 5426 of 2024

In re Estate of Morris Adongo Masan alias Maurice Adongo Masan (Deceased) (Succession Cause 980 of 2014) [2024] KEHC 5426 (KLR) (21 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 5426 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU SUCCESSION CAUSE 980 OF 2014 MS SHARIFF, J MAY 21, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF THE LATE MORRIS ADONGO MASAN ALIAS MAURICE ADONGO MASAN (DECEASED) IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY: IN THE MATTER OF MARGARET OKUTA ...................................................................... 1ST PETITIONER SIPROSA ATIENO ADONGO ....................................................... 2ND PETITIONER RULING 1. I have considered the chamber summons dated 27th February, 2024 and the affidavit in support thereof sworn by Margaret Okuta Adongo and Siprosa Atieno Adongo on even date and I note that the Applicants have deponed that their absence in court on 17th May 2023 was due to the indisposition of Margaret Okuta Adongo. I am persuaded by that explanation and I note that all the beneficiaries are present in court and are agreeable to the proposed mode of distribution once this court considers the prayer for reinstatement favourably. 2. Premised upon the reason aforestated I do hereby reinstate this petition and I do hereby order that the estate of the deceased be distributed as per paragraph 6 of the supporting affidavit of the Petitioners/ Applicants dated 27.2.2024. 3. A certificate of confirmation of grant to issue accordingly. 4. This file is marked as closed. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT KISUMU THIS 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2024. MWANAISHA S. SHARIFF JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/5426/eng@2024-05-21 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.