Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Geoffrey Yogo & Erick Ojuro T/A Otieno, Yogo, Ojuro & Co. Advocates v County Government of Kisumu

Geofirey Yogo & Erick Ojuro T/A Otieno, Yogo, Ojuro & Co. Advocates v County Government Of Kisumu (Miscellaneous Civil Application E060 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 5125 (KLR) (6 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 5125 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION E060 OF 2023 RE ABURILI, J MAY 6, 2024 BETWEEN GEOFFREY YOGO & ERICK OJURO T/A OTIENO, YOGO, OJURO & CO. ADVOCATES ............................................................................................. APPLICANT AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KISUMU ........................................ RESPONDENT (Arising from the professional legal services rendered by the Applicant/Advocate to the Respondent/client in original matter Kisumu Court of Appeal Civil Application No. 42 of 2018) RULING 1. The application dated 14th December 2023 seeks for adoption of the Certificate of Costs dated 11th September 2023 as the decree of this court. 2. It is supported by the affidavit sworn by Geoffrey Ojuro Yogo Advocate sworn on 14th December 2023. 3. The application is not opposed. However, I have perused the said application and the file as a whole. The Ruling on taxation was rendered on 25th May, the year is unknown as it is not pronounced. 4. In addition, this being a Client/Advocate Bill of Costs, it was expected that the primary file wherein the advocate was instructed to represent the client, County Government of Kisumu, being Kisumu Court of Appeal Civil Application No. 42 of 2018 is availed before the Deputy Registrar for perusal to confirm the items in the Advocate/Client Bill of Costs dated 12th May 2023. 5. There is no evidence that the said file was available before the Deputy Registrar. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/5125/eng@2024-05-06 1

page 1 of 2

6. Albeit the Respondent/Client’s advocate is not opposed to the application, it must be made clear that this court cannot rubber stamp wrong or erroneous proceedings as this is a court of law and a court of record. 7. The taxation was not grounded on the primary file wherein the services were allegedly rendered by the Advocate for the Client/Respondent. 8. Accordingly, I set aside the taxation and certificate of costs dated 11th September 2023 and remit the file back to the Deputy Registrar to comply with the matters raised herein before she can tax the Advocate/ Client Bill of Costs dated 12th May 2023 afresh and interpartes. 9. I make no orders as to costs of the application dated 14th December 2023. 10. The matter shall be placed before the Deputy Registrar on 19th June 2024. 11. This Ruling to be typed forthwith. 12. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 6TH DAY OF MAY, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/5125/eng@2024-05-06 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.