Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Onyango Okumu v Republic

Okumu v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E059 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 5019 (KLR) (9 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 5019 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E059 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J MAY 9, 2024 BETWEEN JAMES ONYANGO OKUMU ................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in the High Court Criminal Case No. E033 of 2022 at Kisumu) RULING 1. The Applicant is a convict in Kisumu HCCRC No. E033 of 2022 where he claims he was convicted and sentenced to serve 12 years in prison for the ofience of manslaughter contrary to section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal Code. 2. He now applies for sentence Review and reduction to 10 years’ imprisonment or to a least severe sentence because he has children aged 7 and 13 years old and he is their sole breadwinner. 3. I have considered the application. I have no jurisdiction to reduce sentence imposed by court of concurrent jurisdiction in this matter where it is not even clear which Judge and when the sentencing was done as no court proceedings were annexed, to establish if he was on bond or not during trial. 4. I decline to grant the orders sought. 5. The application dated April 15, 2024 is dismissed. 6. The file is closed. 7. Signal to issue. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 9TH DAY OF MAY, 2024 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/5019/eng@2024-05-09 1

page 1 of 2

R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/5019/eng@2024-05-09 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.