Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samuel Odhiambo Odongo Alias Wesonga v Republic

Odongo v Republic (Criminal Revision E005 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 4788 (KLR) (7 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4788 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL REVISION E005 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J MAY 7, 2024 BETWEEN SAMUEL ODHIAMBO ODONGO ALIAS WESONGA ...................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Convict/Applicant is Samuel Odhiambo Odongo alias Wesonga. He was convicted of the ofience of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code vide Kisumu HCCRC No. 18 of 2009. 2. He was sentenced to serve 25 years’ imprisonment on 26th July 2012 as per the warrant of committal annexed. 3. The sentence does not mention the period that the convict was in prison custody pending trial, according to the warrant of commitment to prison attached. 4. He prays that Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code be taken into account in computing the prison term. 5. From the Judgment of H. K. Chemitei J of 4th July 2012, the Convict was arrested on 12th March 2009. There is no evidence that he benefitted from bond terms in capital ofiences as such ofiences were not bailable pre-2010 Constitution. 6. I invoke Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and order that the 25 years’ imprisonment shall run from 12th March 2009 when the convict was arrested. 7. I so order. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kisumu this 7th Day of May, 2024 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4788/eng@2024-05-07 1

page 1 of 2

R. E. ABURILI JUDGE Page 2 of 2 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4788/eng@2024-05-07 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.