Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Njoroge Kariuki v Job Waweru Kariuki & 9 Others

Kariuki v Kariuki & 9 others (Miscellaneous Civil Case 53 of 2018) [2024] KEHC 4777 (KLR) (2 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4777 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASE 53 OF 2018 DO CHEPKWONY, J MAY 2, 2024 BETWEEN JAMES NJOROGE KARIUKI ................................................................. APPLICANT AND JOB WAWERU KARIUKI & 9 OTHERS .......................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. This matter is for mention for parties to Show Cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, the Notice to Show Cause having been issued on 25/1/2024 and served upon the counsel for the parties on 29/1/2024. Neither party nor their respective counsel are in attendance. There is no representation to explain their absence and neither is there any response filed by either party. 2. I have perused the court record and established that the last time the parties herein attended court was on 15/11/2021 when the matter was fixed for further mention on 2/2/2022 in the presence of counsel for the Applicants who requested for the said mention date after confirming that parties had signed the transfer documents. 3. In the circumstances, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution as per the provision of Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. It is so ordered. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 2nd DAY OF MAY, 2024. D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE In the presence of: No appearance for and by either pary kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/287784/ 1

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant - Martin kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/287784/ 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.