Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jane Wathoni v Penninah Njeri Thongo & Another

Wathoni v Thongo & another (Civil Appeal 127 of 2017) [2024] KEHC 4773 (KLR) (2 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4773 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU CIVIL APPEAL 127 OF 2017 DO CHEPKWONY, J MAY 2, 2024 BETWEEN JANE WATHONI ..................................................................................... APPELLANT AND PENNINAH NJERI THONGO & ANOTHER ................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. This matter is for mention for parties to confirm compliance for directions issued on 12/6/2023 and show cause why the same should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, a Notice to Show Cause having been issued on 5/11/2023. However, there is no appearance by either party or their respective counsel despite having been served with the Notice to Show Cause. Directions on this appeal were issued on 12/6/2023, the same having been admitted for hearing on 16/9/2019. Since then, neither party nor their counsel have attended court and complied with the directions issued on 12/6/2023. This is a clear conduct of parties who have lost interest in their case 2. In the circumstances, the appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution as per the provision of Order 35 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. It is so ordered. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 2nd DAY OF MAY, 2024. D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE In the presence of: No appearance for the Appellant No appearance for the Respondents https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4773/eng@2024-05-02 1

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant - Martin https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4773/eng@2024-05-02 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.