Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samson Kimutai Sang v Republic

Sang v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E030 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 4342 (KLR) (19 April 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4342 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E030 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J APRIL 19, 2024 BETWEEN SAMSON KIMUTAI SANG .................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Sexual Offences Case No. E021 of 2022 at Tamu) RULING 1. The Applicant Samson Kimutai Sang was convicted and sentenced to serve 20 years imprisonment by Hon. A. K. Makoross, SPM vide Tamu SPM Sexual Ofiences Case No. E021 of 2022 on 2nd May 2023, for the ofience of Defilement contrary to section 8 (1) and 8 (3) of the Sexual Offences Act. 2. He claims that the delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by none supply of court proceedings and Judgment and that his family abandoned him. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds and reasons for the delay. 4. I grant the Applicant leave to file an appeal out of time from Tamu Senior Principal Magistrate Sexual Ofiences Case No. E021 of 2022. 5. The appeal to be filed and served within Fourteen (14) days of today. 6. Signal to issue. 7. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4342/eng@2024-04-19 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4342/eng@2024-04-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.