Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Munyole Avaye v Republic

Avaye v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E024 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 4340 (KLR) (19 April 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4340 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E024 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J APRIL 19, 2024 BETWEEN JOHN MUNYOLE AVAYE ....................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Sexual Offences Case No E954 of 2015 at Winam) RULING 1. The convict herein John Munyole Avaye was convicted and sentenced to serve twenty (20) years imprisonment vide Winam SPM Sexual Ofiences Case No. 954 of 2015. 2. He appealed vide Kisumu HCCRA No. 20 of 2018 which appeal was dismissed. 3. He seeks for reduction of sentence. He has served close to 6 years’ imprisonment. 4. This court through Ochieng J.A dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence. 5. I have no jurisdiction at this stage to reduce sentence which is almost 14 years remaining. 6. The convict can only benefit from prison decongestion after serving sentence and the remainder being 3 years and below. 7. I decline to grant the orders sought and dismiss the application dated 13th February 2024. 8. Signal to issue. 9. File closed. 10. I so order. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4340/eng@2024-04-19 1

page 1 of 2

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4340/eng@2024-04-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.