Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Michael Shava & 5 others v Republic & 1 other

Shava & 5 others v Republic (Criminal Appeal E019 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 3761 (KLR) (22 April 2024) (Order) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 3761 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL APPEAL E019 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J APRIL 22, 2024 BETWEEN MICHAEL SHAVA ............................................................................. 1ST APPELLANT ELIZABETH AKINYI SHAVA ......................................................... 2ND APPELLANT LUCY NDUTA WAKUBWA ............................................................ 3RD APPELLANT ISAAC BIWOTT KIPSANG ............................................................. 4TH APPELLANT JOSEPH NJOROGE MUNGAI ........................................................ 5TH APPELLANT MUHANJI BENSON GWAYUMBA ................................................ 6TH APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC .................................................................................................... REPUBLIC ORDER 1. The petition of appeal shall forthwith be served upon the respondent/ODPP 2. The deputy registrar shall ensure the original lower court file and certified record of proceedings are availed to the High Court at the earliest opportunity. 3. The appellants shall endeavour as soon as practicable serve the complete record of appeal. 4. This matter shall be mentioned virtually on 24th June 2024 for directions. Notices shall issue accordingly. DIRECTIONS ISSUED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2024 ________________ D. KAVEDZA https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/3761/eng@2024-04-22 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/3761/eng@2024-04-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.