Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Kennedy Ntonja

Republic v Ntonja (Criminal Case 39 of 2016) [2024] KEHC 3207 (KLR) (20 March 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 3207 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU CRIMINAL CASE 39 OF 2016 EM MURIITHI, J MARCH 20, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND KENNEDY NTONJA ................................................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. The court has considered the evidence adduced by the Prosecution witnesses in the matter seeking to prove the charge of murder C/S 203 as read with 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The court is of the opinion that the Prosecution has established a Prima facie case within the meaning of Bhatt v R [1957] EA 332. 3. In accordance with the guidance of the Court of Appeal in Antony Njue Njeru v R [2006] eKLR [No. 177/2006] the court does not give reasons for its opinion at this stage. 4. The Accused is placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and his rights there under are explained. 5. The defence hearing shall be heard on a date to be fixed in consultation with counsel for the Accused and the DPP. DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2024. EDWARD M. MURIITHI JUDGE APPEARANCES: M/S. Mokua Advocates for the Accused. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/3207/eng@2024-03-20 1

page 1 of 2

Mr. Mukangu for DPP https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/3207/eng@2024-03-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.