Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Michael Mwea v Republic

Mwea v Republic (Revision Case E086 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 3009 (KLR) (20 March 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 3009 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU REVISION CASE E086 OF 2024 HM NYAGA, J MARCH 20, 2024 BETWEEN MICHAEL MWEA .................................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The accused was charged with the offence of; Stealing contrary to Section 275 of the Penal Code. 2. The Pre-sentence Report filed herein is to the effect that the applicant is not suitable for a non-custodial sentence. This is in total contrast to the report that had been filed during the trial dated 24th October, 2023 and which recommended a non-custodial sentence in the form of Community Service Order. 3. I have looked at the facts as set out in the trial court’s record. The complainant is the mother to the applicant. The value of the stolen goods was just Kshs 2,000/= 4. I am of the view that the time spent in custody has been sufficient to remind the applicant of the need to be a Law abiding citizen. 5. Therefore, I hereby revise the sentence imposed by the trial court and sentence the accused to the time served in custody. 6. He is to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024. H. M. NYAGA JUDGE In the presence of; https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/3009/eng@2024-03-20 1

page 1 of 2

C/A Oleperon N/A for state https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/3009/eng@2024-03-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.