Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ktk Advocates v City Council of Nairobi

KTK Advocates v City Council of Nairobi (Miscellaneous Application E018 of 2020) [2024] KEHC 2961 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (14 March 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2961 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E018 OF 2020 EC MWITA, J MARCH 14, 2024 BETWEEN KTK ADVOCATES ................................................................................. PETITIONER AND CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI ......................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application is brought under S. 51(2) of the Advocates Act seeking entry of judgment for Kshs 697,876.30 being the taxed costs. The application is not opposed. 2. I have seen the Certificate of Taxation dated 23/11/2023. The certificate has not been set aside and there is no evidence that some objection to that certificate of Taxation is pending. 3. In the circumstances, the application is allowed. 4. Judgment is hereby entered for the Advocate Applicant for Kshs 697,876.30 as taxed and certified by the Taxing Officer of this court. 5. The amount shall attract interest at 14% from 1/4/2022 until payment in full. 6. The advocate Applicant shall also have costs of this application. Orders accordingly. E. C. MWITA JUDGE 14/3/2024 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/2961/eng@2024-03-14 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.