Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Henry Ngingo Mwachela & 3 others

Republic v Mwachela & 3 others (Criminal Case E003 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 2340 (KLR) (7 March 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2340 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE E003 OF 2021 GMA DULU, J MARCH 7, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND HENRY NGINGO MWACHELA .......................................................... 1ST ACCUSED MATHEW MAGENDA MWACHALA ................................................ 2ND ACCUSED JONES MWABINGU MUNGEREZA ................................................... 3RD ACCUSED RASHID SALIM SALIM ....................................................................... 4TH ACCUSED RULING 1. Having considered the prosecution evidence on record, as well as the submissions filed by the defence counsel, I find that each of the four (4) accused persons herein has a case to answer. 2. I thus hereby to put each of the four (4) accused persons on their defences and proceed to explain to each of them the three options they have in their defences under Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.75). DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 AT VOI IN OPEN COURT. GEORGE DULU JUDGE In the presence of:Alfred/Trizah – Court Assistant Ms. Moke for State https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/2340/eng@2024-03-07 1

page 1 of 2

Mr. Orina for 4th accused and holding brief for Mr. Mosioma for 1st to 3rd accused Page 1 of 1 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/2340/eng@2024-03-07 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.