Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Rachael Muhalia Alias Deinah

Republic v Muhalia alias Deinah (Criminal Case 9 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 2062 (KLR) (28 February 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2062 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VIHIGA CRIMINAL CASE 9 OF 2021 JN KAMAU, J FEBRUARY 28, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND RACHAEL MUHALIA ALIAS DEINAH ................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. This matter was part heard before Musyoka J. This court became seized of the same on 21st March 2023 and parties asked it to proceed from where the matter had reached. 2. On 5th February 2024, the Prosecution closed its case after calling a total of six (6) Prosecution witnesses. 3. Both the Prosecution and the Accused person did not file any Written Submissions on the question of whether or not the Accused person had a case to answer. They both relied on the evidence on record. 4. Having carefully considered the evidence by the Prosecution witnesses, the court was of the opinion that a prima facie case had been established against the Accused person herein to warrant her being put on her defence. She is hereby put on her defence. 5. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT VIHIGA THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 J. KAMAU JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/2062/eng@2024-02-28 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.