Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Julius Muli Kinyua v Republic

Kinyua v Republic (Criminal Revision 63 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 1504 (KLR) (20 February 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 1504 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 63 OF 2023 DR KAVEDZA, J FEBRUARY 20, 2024 BETWEEN JULIUS MULI KINYUA .......................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant filed an application seeking sentence review. In the trial before the subordinate court he was charged and pleaded guilty for the offence of being in possession of narcotic drugs contrary to section 3 (1) as read with section 3 (2) (a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act No. 4 of 1994. He was sentenced to serve five (5) years imprisonment. 2. Although sentences are intended, inter alia, to punish an offender for his wrongdoing, they also aim to rehabilitate offenders to renounce their criminal tendencies and become law-abiding citizens. I have no doubt that the sentence imposed by the trial court, in this case, was lawful. However, the applicant was a first offender and pleaded guilty to the offence and hence did not waste the court’s time. I am satisfied that the sentence was harsh and manifestly excessive. 3. The sentence of five years imprisonment is vacated and substituted with a sentence of one-year imprisonment to run from the date of his conviction. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 __________________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/1504/eng@2024-02-20 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.