Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Peter Sande Wanyonyi v Republic

Wanyonyi v Republic (Criminal Petition 36 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 3861 (KLR) (3 April 2023) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3861 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUNGOMA CRIMINAL PETITION 36 OF 2019 REA OUGO, J APRIL 3, 2023 BETWEEN PETER SANDE WANYONYI ............................................................... PETITIONER AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. Peter Sande Wanyonyi , the petitioner, filed a petition on the 14th November 2019 seeking re-sentencing in respect of CRC No. 258/07 at CM’s Bungoma. The petitioner states that he was charged and sentenced to death for the ofience of robbery with violence in CRC No. 258 of 2007. He filed an appeal to the High Court vide HCCRA No. 2,3,& 9 of 2008 at Bungoma & CRA No. 279/09 at Eldoret. His death sentence was later commuted to a life sentence in 2009. He has been in custody for 12 years since his arrest. That based on the Supreme Court ruling the mandatory death sentence awarded to him is unconstitutional inhumane and degrading. 2. The petition was opposed by the respondent on grounds that the petitioner’s appeal was dismissed by the High court and that this court does not have the jurisdiction to entertain the petition. 3. I agree with the Respondent that this court lacks the jurisdiction to grant the orders being sought as a court of similar jurisdiction heard the petitioner’s appeal and dismissed it. . The directions given on 6th July 2021 by the Supreme Court in the case of Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic [2017] eKLR was that the said decisional law is not an authority to declare all mandatory or minimum sentences unconstitutional. Its application was limited to murder cases falling within its scope. Therefore, the petitioner’s being a case of robbery with violence, the request by the petitioner for review of sentence on the basis of Muruatetu case is without merit . His petition therefore fails and is dismissed. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3861/eng@2023-04-03 1

page 1 of 2

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT BUNGOMA VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS THIS 3RD APRIL, 2023. R.E.OUGO JUDGE In the presence of; Petitioner in person Mr. Ayekha For the State/Respondent Okwaro C/A https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3861/eng@2023-04-03 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.