Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Moses Aura Kigen v Republic

Kigen v Republic (Criminal Revision E676 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3753 (KLR) (20 April 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3753 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CRIMINAL REVISION E676 OF 2022 HM NYAGA, J APRIL 20, 2023 BETWEEN MOSES AURA KIGEN ............................................................................ APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant Moses Aura Kigen was convicted on his own plea of guilty for the ofience of burglary contrary to section 304(2) and stealing contrary to Section 279 (b) of the Penal Code. 2. On November 8, 2022 he was sentenced to serve 6 months’ imprisonment. 3. He has so far served about 5 months in prison. 4. According to sentence Review Report filed on February 1, 2023 the Applicant is 20 years old and he schooled up to class 7. He has been conducting himself well while in prison and he is remorseful. The Community Service officer one Kevin Kariuki recommends he be placed on Community service. 5. Considering the Applicant has spent considerable time in prison and in the spirit of decongesting the prison, I hereby exercise judicial discretion and suspend the remainder of the prison term and order for his release from prison forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. 6. File closed. DATED, SIGNED & DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 20TH APRIL, 2023. H.M. NYAGA JUDGE In the presence of: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3753/eng@2023-04-20 1

page 1 of 2

C/A Jenifier Ms Murunga for state Applicant - https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3753/eng@2023-04-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.