Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Yusuf Haji Manya Lumbasi & 5 others

Republic v Lumbasi & 5 others (Criminal Case 10 of 2018) [2023] KEHC 3492 (KLR) (28 April 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3492 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAKAMEGA CRIMINAL CASE 10 OF 2018 WM MUSYOKA, J APRIL 28, 2023 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND YUSUF HAJI MANYA LUMBASI ......................................................... 1ST ACCUSED DICKSON MANYA OPEMBE .............................................................. 2ND ACCUSED RAMADHAN MANYA NASHISAKO ................................................ 3RD ACCUSED ZABLON MBIRI OTSIENO ................................................................. 4TH ACCUSED SHABAN OPWORA NAMUKURU .................................................... 5TH ACCUSED CHARLES ORATA OPEMBE ............................................................... 6TH ACCUSED RULING 1. I have perused the record, and I had also heard all the witnesses who testified in the matter. I am persuaded that the Republic has adduced sufficient evidence, to warrant the accused persons being put on their defence. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 WM MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Erick Zalo, Court Assistant. Appearances Ms. Kagai, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the Republic. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3492/eng@2023-04-28 1

page 1 of 2

Ms. Omar, Advocate for the accused person. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3492/eng@2023-04-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.