Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lucas Odhiambo Okeyo v Republic

Okeyo v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E097 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3308 (KLR) (13 April 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3308 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E097 OF 2022 RE ABURILI, J APRIL 13, 2023 BETWEEN LUCAS ODHIAMBO OKEYO ................................................................ APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant Lucas Odhiambo Okeyo was convicted of the ofience of Rape and indecent assault contrary to Section 20 of the Sexual Offences Act vide Winam Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Sexual Ofiences Case No 86 of 2020 and sentenced to serve ten (10) years imprisonment on September 20, 2022, as per the warrant of commitment dated September 20, 2022 annexed. 2. He now applies that the period he spent in custody be considered in sentencing as it was not considered. 3. The Applicant does not state when he was arrested and neither did he annex copies of proceedings from the lower court for perusal and verification whether he was in custody or released on bond pending trial. 4. I find the application filed on September 30, 2022 not supported. The same is hereby dismissed. 5. The applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application annexing proceedings from the lower court for reconsideration. 6. This file is therefore closed. 7. I so order. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kisumu this 13 th Day of April, 2023 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3308/eng@2023-04-13 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3308/eng@2023-04-13 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.