Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Malonza Mutisya v Republic

Mutisya v Republic (Criminal Revision E210 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3268 (KLR) (29 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3268 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MAKUENI CRIMINAL REVISION E210 OF 2022 TM MATHEKA, J MARCH 29, 2023 BETWEEN JAMES MALONZA MUTISYA ............................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The appellant vide an undated chamber summons filed on November 17, 2022 seeks the review of his sentence under section 332(2) of the Criminal Procedural Code. 2. On January 8, 2008, he was sentenced to serve 30 years imprisonment for rape contrary to section 140 of the Penal Code in Kilungu RMCRC 237/2006. 3. The record shows he was arrested on May 25, 2006 and he took plea on June 5, 2006. He was granted a bond of Kshs 200,000/= with a surety of similar surety amount. He remained in custody until January 8, 2008 when he was sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment. 4. It is evident from the record that in meting the sentence the learned trial magistrate did not abide by the provisions of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code – which states: Subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Penal Code every sentence shall be deemed to commence from, and to include the whole of the day of the date on which it was pronounced ….. Provided that where the person sentenced under sub-section (1) has prior to such sentence been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.” 5. Pursuant to the above provision, it was necessary for the learned trial magistrate to indicate whether or not he had taken into account the period the applicant had been in custody pending trial. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3268/eng@2023-03-29 1

page 1 of 2

6. In the absence of that – it is only fair and just – that pursuant to this court’s supervisory jurisdiction under article 165(6) and 7 of the Constitution – the applicant’s sentence is revised as follows: – i. The applicant to serve 30 years’ imprisonment with effect from May 25, 2006 which is the date he was arrested and placed in custody. ii. A revised committal warrant to issue accordingly and be served upon Kenya Prisons Services, the officer in charge Makueni Main Prison for compliance. DATED, SIGNED & DELIVERED THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023. MUMBUA T. MATHEKA JUDGE CA: Mwiwa Applicant Present in Court Ms. Nyakibia for State https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3268/eng@2023-03-29 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.