Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Brian Kibet Kimutai Alias Cosmas Ochieng v Republic

Kimutai v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E127 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3083 (KLR) (28 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3083 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E127 OF 2022 RE ABURILI, J MARCH 28, 2023 BETWEEN BRIAN KIBET KIMUTAI ALIAS COSMAS OCHIENG ..................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant Brian Kibet Kimutai alias Cosmas Ochieng is a convict in Maseno Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No E352 of 2022. He claims that he was convicted on October 5, 2022 but that he was unable to file an appeal in time because he had no money and seeks leave of this court to file an appeal out of time yet he was sentenced to serve nine (9) years imprisonment for impersonation. 2. I have considered the application dated December 13, 2022. The prosecution will in no way be prejudiced if leave to appeal out of time is granted as the delay is not inordinate. 3. I allow the application dated November 8, 2022 and filed in court on December 13, 2022. 4. I grant the Applicant herein Brian Kibet Kimutai alias Cosmas Ochieng leave to file an appeal out of time from conviction in Maseno Senior Principal Magistrate’s court Criminal Case No E352 of 2022. 5. The Petition of appeal to be filed and served within fourteen (14) days of today. 6. Applicant to be notified of this order. 7. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/3083/eng@2023-03-28 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.