Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Salim

Republic v Salim (Criminal Case 9 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 2936 (KLR) (23 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 2936 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL CASE 9 OF 2019 ACA ONG’INJO, J MARCH 23, 2023 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND MUNIR MURAD SALIM ............................................................................ ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused Munir Murad Salim is charged with the ofience of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The particulars are that Munir Murad Salim on the January 4, 2019 at Barisheba area Kisauni subcounty within Mombasa county murdered SA a female child aged 8years. 3. This court has considered the evidence of 15 prosecution witnesses as well as the written submissions filed by the defence counsel and find that the prosecution raised a prima facie case sufficient to place accused on defence. He has a case to answer. Dated, signed and delivered in Open Court this 23 day of March 2023 HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJO JUDGE In the presence of:Ogwel- Court Assistant Ms. Rajab Advocate for Accused Mr. Ngiri – Counsel for State – Present Accused – Present in person Hon. Lady Justice A. Ong’injo https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2936/eng@2023-03-23 1

page 1 of 2

Judge Ms. Rajab Advocate I pray for defence hearing date so that I can consult my client and agree on how he wants to defend himself. Order – Defence hearing – 15/06/2023 Hon. Lady Justice A. Ong’injo Judge CR. Case 9.2019 Page 2 of 2 A. Ong’injo J https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2936/eng@2023-03-23 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.