Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Patrick Owino Oweke v Republic

Oweke v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E088 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 2794 (KLR) (24 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 2794 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E088 OF 2022 RE ABURILI, J MARCH 24, 2023 BETWEEN PATRICK OWINO OWEKE ................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant herein Patrick Owino Oweke by his application filed on August 24, 2022 seeks for orders that the court does consider the period of three (3) years spent in custody in computing the ten (10) years imprisonment sentence imposed on him on June 9, 2022 for the ofience of Manslaughter in High Court Criminal Case No 05 of 2019. 2. The application is pursuant to the provisions of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. I have considered the application. The Applicant does not disclose when he was arrested and no court proceedings are annexed for this court to establish whether the Applicant/Convict was released on bond pending trial. 4. I find the application devoid of material for consideration. It is hereby dismissed. 5. The convict can file a fresh application with full disclosures and material for consideration on merit. 6. Order/signal to issue. 7. File closed. 8. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023 R E ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2794/eng@2023-03-24 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2794/eng@2023-03-24 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.