Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Meru South Farmers Cooperative Union Ltd v Onesmus Njagi Mwiandi

Meru South Farmers Cooperative Union Ltd v Mwiandi (Civil Appeal 4 of 2015) [2023] KEHC 2731 (KLR) (24 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 2731 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT CHUKA CIVIL APPEAL 4 OF 2015 LW GITARI, J MARCH 24, 2023 BETWEEN MERU SOUTH FARMERS COOPERATIVE UNION LTD ................ APPLICANT AND ONESMUS NJAGI MWIANDI ........................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the application dated March 14, 2023 which was filed under a certificate of urgency. I did certify the application as urgent and ordered that it be served. I have noted that the counsel for the applicant has filed an affidavit of service showing that the respondent was duly served. The respondent has not appeared nor have they filed replying affidavit to oppose the application. 2. In the circumstances I find that the application is not opposed. The order sought to be set aside is not serving any purpose as this appeal is not pending as it was withdrawn on November 1, 2018. 3. The applicant is at liberty to enjoy the right to his property without any unnecessary hindrance. For these reasons I allow the application. I order that: 1. The orders of inhibition issued on land parcel No Magumoni/Mukuuni/439 on February 18, 2020 is hereby lifted. 2. I make no orders as to costs. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT CHUKA THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2023. L.W. GITARI JUDGE 24/3/2023 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2731/eng@2023-03-24 1

page 1 of 2

Court: This file be now closed. L.W. GITARI JUDGE 24/3/2023 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2731/eng@2023-03-24 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.