Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Geoffrey Mungai Waweru v Republic

Waweru v Republic (Criminal Revision 82 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 2456 (KLR) (Crim) (20 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 2456 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION 82 OF 2019 LN MUTENDE, J MARCH 20, 2023 BETWEEN GEOFFREY MUNGAI WAWERU .......................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. Through a chamber summons dated the March 14, 2019, the applicant has called upon this court to invoke the provisions of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code that provides that: “ Subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Penal Code (cap 63) every sentence shall be deemed to commence from, and to include the whole of the day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided in this Code. Provided that where the person sentenced under subsection (1) has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.” 2. In its order the trial court stated as follows: “ Whereas I am required to take into account the period the accused person has been in custody which I hereby do” 3. It is apparent that the trial court complied with the law. Therefore, the application has no merit. Accordingly, it is dismissed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI, THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2456/eng@2023-03-20 1

page 1 of 2

L. N. MUTENDE JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2456/eng@2023-03-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.