Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Anne Delorie v The Aga Khan Health Services Ltd

Delorie v Aga Khan Health Services Ltd (Civil Case 64 of 2005) [2023] KEHC 2118 (KLR) (Civ) (17 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 2118 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CIVIL CASE 64 OF 2005 AN ONGERI, J MARCH 17, 2023 BETWEEN ANNE DELORIE ........................................................................................ PLAINTIFF AND THE AGA KHAN HEALTH SERVICES LTD ..................................... DEFENDANT RULING 1. The application coming for consideration in this ruling is the one dated 3/11/2022 seeking correction of an error in the computation of the award in the judgment delivered on 31/5/2022. 2. The application is not opposed by the respondent and I find that the same is meritorious. 3. Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act states as follows:“ Clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees or orders or errors arising therein from any accidental slip or omission, may at any time be corrected by the court either on its own motion or on the application of any of the parties.” 4. The computation of damages is accordingly corrected at number 55 of the judgment delivered on 31/5/2022 to read a total of kshs.6,193,452.00 instead of kshs.5,193,452.00. Orders to issue accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023. ……………………… A. ONGERI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2118/eng@2023-03-17 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE In the presence of: ……………………………. for the Plaintifi ……………………………. for the Defendant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/2118/eng@2023-03-17 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.