Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jacob Juma Msituni v Office of The Director of Public Prosecution

Msituni v Office of the Director of Public Prosecution (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E202 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 1992 (KLR) (3 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 1992 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E202 OF 2022 ACA ONG’INJO, J MARCH 3, 2023 BETWEEN JACOB JUMA MSITUNI ......................................................................... APPLICANT AND OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION ........ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant Jacob Juma Msituni was convicted for the offience of murder in Mombasa HC CR No 10 of 2008 and sentenced to serve 40 years years. 2. The Applicant now seek that the court be pleased to award a lenient definite sentence and to invoke the provisions of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Order that the 4 years he spent in remand custody be factored in his sentence. 3. The Applicant was arraigned in court in 2008 and was convicted on March 12, 2012 and sentenced on March 13, 2012. 4. The applicant is entitled to the period spent in remand custody subject to confirmation from the trial courts file that he was not released on bond. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT/ONLINE THROUGH MS TEAMS, THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2023 HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJO JUDGE In the presence of:Ogwel – Court Assistant Applicant – Present in person https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/1992/eng@2023-03-03 1

page 1 of 2

Mr. Ngiri for Respondent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/1992/eng@2023-03-03 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.