Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic (dpp) v Hudson Mutsami Naburendi

Republic (DPP) v Naburendi (Criminal Case 26 of 2014) [2023] KEHC 1820 (KLR) (2 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 1820 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAKAMEGA CRIMINAL CASE 26 OF 2014 PJO OTIENO, J MARCH 2, 2023 BETWEEN REPUBLIC (DPP) ................................................................................. PROSECUTOR AND HUDSON MUTSAMI NABURENDI ......................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. From a perusal of the evidence adduced by the prosecution for the three witnesses, the court finds that a prima facie case has been established and the accused is thus put on his defence to answer and rebut the prosecution’s case. 2. Defence hearing on DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN KAKAMEGA THIS 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2023. PATRICK J. O. OTIENO JUDGE In the presence of: Momanyi for Ondieki for the Accused Ms. Chala for the Prosecution/State Court Assistant: Polycap https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/1820/eng@2023-03-02 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.