Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Mitei

Republic v Mitei (Criminal Case 38 of 2017) [2023] KEHC 1313 (KLR) (1 March 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 1313 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE 38 OF 2017 HK CHEMITEI, J MARCH 1, 2023 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND HARUN KIPRONO MITEI ........................................................................ ACCUSED RULING 1. The court has heard mitigation by both parties herein. The court has also perused the presentencing reported dated 7/2/2023 filed on 8/2/23. 2. It appears that the trouble the accused has had is abuse of alcohol. Further, he has had a run with the law including being charged with the ofience of Creating Disturbance. It is indicated that he absconded. 3. The accused at the same time has had a strained relationship with his mother who is the only surviving parent. 4. The family is still in the process of reconciling with the victim’s family. 5. In view of the above observations, the court would have considered a non-custodial sentence. The report however militates against him. 6. Consequently, and so as to help the accused hopefully come out of his alcoholism, he better be held in custody for some time. 7. In the premises, the accused is hereby sentenced to serve 10 (ten) years imprisonment from 4/9/2017. 8 Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA VIDEO LINK AT NAKURU THIS 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2023. H. K. CHEMITEI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/1313/eng@2023-03-01 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/1313/eng@2023-03-01 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.