Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kelvin Ochieng Mang’ula v Republic

Mang’ula v Republic (Criminal Revision E085 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 1241 (KLR) (16 February 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 1241 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KERICHO CRIMINAL REVISION E085 OF 2022 AN ONGERI, J FEBRUARY 16, 2023 BETWEEN KELVIN OCHIENG MANG’ULA .......................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant filed this Revision Application seeking review of the sentence of 8 years imprisonment meted upon him for the following ofiences:(i) Stealing livestock (years’ imprisonment) (ii) Being in possession of cannabis led sativa (3 years imprisonment) (iii) Destroying evidence (2 years imprisonment). 2. The sentences were to run consecutively. I have perused the pre-sentence Report filed by the Probation Officer. 3. The applicant is depicted as a habitual thief who has been terrorizing neighbours and a dealer in narcotic drugs. 4. I find that the sentences meted upon him are appropriate not only for purposes of curbing crime but also to deter others who may be tempted to emulate him 5. The Revision Application filed by the Applicant lacks in merit and the same is dismissed. 6. The sentence meted upon the applicant are lawful. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KERICHO THIS 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023. A. N. ONGERI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/1241/eng@2023-02-16 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/1241/eng@2023-02-16 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.