Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 945 of 2023

Republic v Wachira (Criminal Case E048 of 2020) [2023] KEHC 945 (KLR) (Crim) (16 February 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 945 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASE E048 OF 2020 DO OGEMBO, J FEBRUARY 16, 2023 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND ISAAC GICHUKI WACHIRA ..................................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused herein was Isaac Gichuki Wachira, was initially charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. He has plea bargained and pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter contrary to section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal Code, Cap 63 Laws of Kenya. He has accordingly been convicted of the same. 2. In mitigation, the accused has raised a number of issue for consideration including. i. Thatupon commission of the crime, he surrendered himself to Kayole police station and has fully cooperated with the investigators. ii. That it was an act of self defence as deceased first attacked him. iii. That it was night and the 2 were intoxicated. iv. That he has written a confession and asks for forgiveness. v. That he is remorseful and regrets what happened. vi. That he is a sole bread winner and provider of 2 school going children. vii. That he is a first offender. He pleads for a lenient sentence. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/945/eng@2023-02-16 1

page 1 of 2

3. From the side of the prosecution, it has been noted the following: i. Thata young lady aged 29 years lost her life in this incident and she was attacked at her work place. ii. That deceased was sole bread winner of her 6 year old son who now is an orphan and staying with his aged grandmother. iii. That the family of the deceased is traumatized over the loss of their breadwinner. 4. A plea was made for a custodial sentence that refiects the seriousness of the offence and dignity of the deceased. 5. Prior to the above mitigations being raised, the court obtained a probation oficers pre-sentence report. Same dated February 9, 2023 has duly been filed. Of note from the report is the negative attitude of the family of the deceased towards the accused i.e the family is aggrieved even of the fact accused had been granted bail. They are still hurting and pray for punitive sentence. 6. The sentencing policy guidelines provides for the rational and purpose of sentencing. Amongst the objectives noted are retributions, deterrence, rehabilitation, restorative justice, community protection and denunciation. 7. I have considered the circumstances of this case, and the mitigation raised by the accused. A young lady in her prime, at 29 years, lost her life, leaving behind a young son. The accused acted rather cruelly in disappearing from the scene, leaving the body of the deceased at the scene. His intention was to escape and were it not for his father, he probably may not have presented himself to the police. I am in the circumstances convinced that the accused deserves a deterrent custodial sentence. 8. I accordingly sentence the accused to serve 15 years imprisonment. This sentence shall run from the date of this sentence. He has 14 days right of appeal. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 16TH FEBRUARY, 2023 Court: Ruling read out in open court in the presence of the accused, Mr. Kioko for the accused and Ms. Njoroge for the state. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 16TH FEBRUARY, 2023 Mr. Kioko: We pray that security documents be released. Ms. Njoroge: That is okay. Court: Security documents may be released to the surety as prayed. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/945/eng@2023-02-16 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.