Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Douglas Musa Litunya v Republic

Litunya v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E011 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 855 (KLR) (16 February 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 855 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT SIAYA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E011 OF 2023 RE ABURILI, J FEBRUARY 16, 2023 BETWEEN DOUGLAS MUSA LITUNYA ................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (Being an Application for sentence review in Judgment, conviction and sentence in Siaya HC Criminal Case No. 50/2015 by Hon. J. A. Makau - Judge) RULING 1. I have perused the application filed on February 6, 2023 by the convict Douglas Musa Litunya who is serving death sentence at Manyani Maximum Prison. The applicant seeks for review of death sentence imposed on him vide Siaya HC Cr 50/2015 by J Makau upon conviction for the ofience of Murder. He does not indicate whether he appealed against that death sentence or not. He wants to be placed on probation. He has not attached any proceedings or judgment or order of the court on Appeal. No document to support the death sentence review is annexed. 2. The original court file is not traceable in our Registry and it no doubt appears that it was transmitted to the Court of Appeal as is the case with such serious cases. 3. I find the application not well grounded or supported by relevant material for consideration by this court. It is hereby dismissed. 4. File closed. Dated, signed and delivered at Siaya this 16th Day of February, 2023 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/855/eng@2023-02-16 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Douglas Musa Litunya v Republic — Original judgment | Caselaw