Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jacob Kamure Peter v Republic

Peter v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 219 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 654 (KLR) (Crim) (7 February 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 654 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION 219 OF 2019 DO OGEMBO, J FEBRUARY 7, 2023 BETWEEN JACOB KAMURE PETER ...................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. Dated March 22, 2019 and filed herein on May 7, 2019. The same application seeks revision of the sentence of the applicant so as to give account to the period the applicant served in remand custody, pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant has deponed that he spent a period that was not factored in the sentence imposed. 2. In the short objection, the prosecution left the matter to the court to decide. 3. I have considered this application. I have also considered the record of proceedings of the trial court. The applicant was charged with 2 counts of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code. He was first arraigned before the court on July 22, 2013. He was eventually convicted and sentenced to serve 10 years imprisonment on each count. This was on November 7, 2018. 4. I have considered the sentence proceedings of November 7, 2018. The applicant was accorded the opportunity to mitigate which he duly did through his advocate. And in sentencing the applicant, the court noted as follows:“ I have considered the mitigation by the accused as well as the pre-sentence report herein. However, the offences here are of a serious nature calling for a deterrent sentence. I do also take note that the accused has been in remand since 2013….” https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/654/eng@2023-02-07 1

page 1 of 2

5. The court went on to pass the applicant to serve 10 years imprisonment on each count, the same to run concurrently. 6. The sentence provided for under section 296(2) of the Penal Code reads;“ If the offender is armed with any dangerous or offensive weapon or instruments, or is in company with on or more other person or persons, or if, at or immediately before or immediately after the time of such robbery, he wounds, beats, strikes or uses any other personal violence to any person, he shall be sentenced to death.” 7. It is clear that in sentencing the applicant, the trial court duly considered the period the applicant had spent in remand awaiting determination of his case. The sentence meted out is also proper and legal. This application therefore lacks any merit. I dismiss the same wholly. Orders accordingly. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 7th FEBRUARY, 2023 COURT: RULING READ OUT IN COURT (ON-LINE) IN PRESENCE OF THE APPLICANT AND MS. ADHIAMBO FOR STATE D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 7TH FEBRUARY, 2023. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/654/eng@2023-02-07 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.