Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mugambi Kiogo v Republic

Kiogo v Republic (Revision Case E258 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 554 (KLR) (2 February 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 554 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU REVISION CASE E258 OF 2022 TW CHERERE, J FEBRUARY 2, 2023 BETWEEN MUGAMBI KIOGO .................................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. Mugambi Kiogo (Applicant) was charged in Meru Cr. Case No. E977 of 2021 with forcible detainer contrary to section 91 of the Penal Code and threatening breach of peace contrary to section 95(1) (b) of the same Act. He was convicted and sentenced on November 1, 2022 to serve 18 months and 4 months respectively. 2. I have considered the probation report filed on December 22, 2022. It reveals that Applicant who is 65 years old is sickly and on medication. He regrets his actions. The report recommends that a noncustodial sentence. 3. I have considered the probation report. Applicant has served 2 ½ months of his 18 months’ sentence. Considering his age and health status, I find that this is a suitable case for review of sentence. 4. It is therefore ordered that the 18 months and 4 months’ sentences be and are hereby commuted to period already served. DELIVERED IN MERU THIS 02nd__ DAY OF February__ 2023 WAMAE. T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Appearances Court Assistant - Kinoti https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/554/eng@2023-02-02 1

page 1 of 2

Applicant - Present For the Respondent - Ms. Kitoto (PPC) https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/554/eng@2023-02-02 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.