Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Prosecutor v Loice Achieng Dallas

Prosecutor v Dallas (Criminal Case E002 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 296 (KLR) (Crim) (26 January 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 296 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASE E002 OF 2021 DO OGEMBO, J JANUARY 26, 2023 BETWEEN PROSECUTOR ............................................................................................ REPUBLIC AND LOICE ACHIENG DALLAS ........................................................................ ACCUSED RULING 1. The applicant Loise Achieng Dallashas filed an application herein dated December 3, 2022. The application seeks that the applicant be released on bail. It was submitted that the applicant would not interfere with the prosecution witnesses. That PW1 has since stated that he lives with the witness in Busia. That being a senior officer in government, it is only fair that she be released on bail to go and retire. 2. The prosecution has opposed this application. That bail was denied to first have the minor testify. That the minor is yet to testify. And that the court already found that the applicant is a flight risk, which still remains the case. That there is therefore no change of circumstances to warrant any revision. 3. I have considered this application and the submissions made for and against it. This application is in effect, a revision application seeking a revision of the orders of the court issued on March 29, 2022. In the said ruling of the court, the applicant’s application for bail was dismissed on grounds that some of the prosecution witnesses in fact stay with the applicant and it would be inappropriate to release the accused to go back and stay with the same witnesses. From the evidence of PW1 it is clear that the minor witnesses no longer stay in the house of the accused, but rather with PW1 in Busia. This is a fundamental change in the circumstances of this case in so far as the real fear of interference with the witnesses by the accused has totally diminished. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/296/eng@2023-01-26 1

page 1 of 2

4. It is for this reason that I find merit in this application dated December 3, 2022. I allow the same and order that the applicant may be released on bond on the following terms;i) A bond of Kshs 2 million with 1 surety of a similar amount. ii) In the alternative, a cash bail of Kshs 200,000/= iii) If released on bail, the applicant is ordered never to contact and or interfere with any prosecution witnesses, either directly or indirectly till this case is determined. iv) The accused is ordered, it on bond, to attend court at all times as shall be ordered from time to time till this case is determined. It is so ordered. HON. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 26TH JANUARY 2023. Court: Ruling read out in open court in the presence of the accuseds, Mr. Ndiso advocate for accused and Ms. Dela for the state. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 26TH JANUARY 2023. Mr. Ndiso: Accused 2 is unwell. We ask that she be taken to hospital. Ms. Dela: We do not object. Court: Accused 2 to be treated. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2023/296/eng@2023-01-26 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.