Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Isaac Benard Okutu v Republic

Okutu v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 89 of 2019) [2022] KEHC 3113 (KLR) (24 June 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 3113 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAKAMEGA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION 89 OF 2019 WM MUSYOKA, J JUNE 24, 2022 BETWEEN ISAAC BENARD OKUTU ...................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Motion herein, undated, but filed on 25th October 2019, principally seeks review or substitution of sentence. The applicant was convicted in an undisclosed criminal case at the Magistrate’s court, and he lodged an appeal at the High Court whose details are not disclosed. 2. I can only consider review of sentence if the trial court case and the appellate court case files are disclosed. I am unable to give any directions on the matter. The said Motion is incompetent, and I hereby strike it out. The file herein to be closed. 3. Copies of this ruling to be made available to the applicant and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA ON THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 WM MUSYOKA JUDGE Erick Zalo, Court Assistant. Isaac Benard Onyango, the applicant, in person. Mr. Mwangi, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the respondent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/3113/eng@2022-06-24 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.