Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Sasah General Merchants Ltd & 1 other v Caren Achieng Ouma

Sasah General Merchants Ltd & another v Ouma (Civil Appeal 22 of 2020) [2022] KEHC 2985 (KLR) (22 June 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 2985 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT HOMA BAY CIVIL APPEAL 22 OF 2020 KW KIARIE, J JUNE 22, 2022 BETWEEN SASAH GENERAL MERCHANTS LTD .......................................... 1ST APPLICANT SAMWEL ODHIAMBO AKUMU .................................................... 2ND APPLICANT AND CAREN ACHIENG OUMA ................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. 2. 3. The appellants/applicants moved the court by way of Notice of Motion dated 10th January, 2022. The application is brought under sections 1A, 1B & 3A,63 & 95 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 17 Rule 2(3), Order 42 Rule 21, Order 51 Rule 6 Civil Procedure Rules, Articles 22 (1), 27 (1), 47, 48, 50, 159 (2), 165 & 258 of the Constitution of Kenya. The applicants are seeking the following orders: a. That the matter be certified urgent and be heard in the first instance and/or on priority basis. [Spent] b. That this court be pleased to set aside the orders dated and made on 9th November, 2021. c. That the applicants’ appeal be reinstated for hearing and disposal on merits. d. That costs be in the cause. The application is premised on grounds a. That the applicants were not served with the notice to show cause why the suit ought not to be dismissed. b. That the appeal has taken long to set down for hearing due to non-supply of typed proceedings. The application was opposed by the respondent who contended that the application lacks merit. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/2985/eng@2022-06-22 1

page 1 of 2

4. I have checked the record and though the notice to show cause was issued, there was no return of service to indicate whether the appellants were served. For this reason I will vacate the orders of 9th November, 2021. 5. Though appellants/applicants have contended that they have failed to file the record of appeal for failure to be supplied with the typed proceedings, this position may not be correct. Our record show that the original file was forwarded to this court on 30th March, 2021 with typed proceedings. I will therefore give the appellant 14 days within which to file the record of appeal failure to do so, the respondent may be at liberty to move the court. 6. Costs be in the cause. DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT HOMA BAY THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022 KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/2985/eng@2022-06-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.